Samuel Ibn Tibbon (c. –) was a translator, philosopher, and philosophical commentator on the Bible. He is most famous for his. Judah ben Saul ibn Tibbon, (born , Granada, Spain—died c. , Marseille ), Jewish physician and translator of Jewish Arabic-language works into. Jacob ben Tibbon is also known by the Latin version of his name, Prophatius Judaeus, and in Provence he is known by the name Don Pro Fiat. The ibn Tibbon .
|Published (Last):||12 September 2010|
|PDF File Size:||6.42 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.74 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
An anonymous translation of the text, published by Kupfer, is clearly not his work. Inwhile returning from Alexandria, Samuel ibn Tibbon wrote on shipboard Biur meha-Millot ha-Zarot, an explanation of the philosophical terms of Guide for the Perplexed by Maimonides.
In Singer, Isidore ; et al. Samuel’s reputation is based not on his original writings, but on his translations, especially that of Maimonides’ Guide for the Perplexed in He further advises his son to observe rigorously the laws of diet, lest he, like others, become ill frequently in consequence of intemperate and unwholesome eating, which would not fail to engender mistrust in him as a physician on the part of the general public.
The Commentary on Ecclesiastes It seems that this was Ibn Tibbon’s first major exegetical work; it was likely completed sometime between and He exhorts him to morality and to the study of the Torah as well as of the profane sciences, including medicine. Like the commentary on Ecclesiastes, it is digressive and exegetical, although in general it follows the order of Guide of the Perplexedpart III.
Philosophy and Exegesis 7. Ibn Tibbon, for his part, worked with the biblical texts singled out by Maimonides, but developed ideas drawn from al-Farabi and Averroes.
Many examples of this type have been enumerated by the logicians. This page was last edited on 19 Septemberat Views Read Edit View history. I have collected a large library for thy sake so that thou needest never borrow a book of any one. His fine linguistic sense and his conception of the art of translating are shown by his counsels on this subject.
Classical, Early, and Medieval Prose and Writers: Editing the text, comparing manuscripts The first order of business in translating a text is the tjbbon of a reliable edition. The third type is the rhetorical syllogism, in which the premises are convincing, that is, they convince the masses of their truth such that they believe in them.
Jacob ben Machir ibn Tibbon
Mosad ha-Rav Kook, This presented a ready lexicon of sorts for the translator: This is suggested by the surprising similarity between the interests of Ibn Tibbon and those of tibbo contemporaries, such as Michael Scot and Alfred of Sarashel. A brief description of each of the translations will be given here.
Retrieved from ” https: The translation itself generally circulated with the glossary, together with Ibn Tibbon’s marginal annotations, an introduction on translation, and other study aids tibobn ad hoc discussions.
Nevukhat ha-Morimor “Perplexity of the Rebellious”. This is what he was trained to be by his father.
Let the waters be gathered Gen 1: The text from Perush ha-Millot ha-Zaroted. Rhetorical Statement [ Ma’amar Haggadi ]: If this attribution were correct, it would contribute important information to Ibn Tibbon’s biography. Unlike Judah al-Harizi, his rival translator, he was not concerned with felicity of style or purity of language but accuracy in meaning. Why did Ibn Tibbon translate the Meteorology before any other work by Aristotle? The Ibn Tibbon dynasty of translators was instrumental in creating a philosophical library in Hebrew.
Among his outstanding renditions from Arabic into Hebrew are the following:. Why didn’t he write straightforward philosophical or theological summas or commentaries on philosophical works by Aristotle or Averroes? A brief discussion of the tibobn will be given here. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. Keep thy library in order, so that thou wilt not need to search for a book. He was criticized for in method—by al-Harizi and others—but it tbibon his method and terminology that ultimately won out and became authoritative throughout the later middle ages.
Judah ben Saul ibn Tibbon | Jewish physician and translator |
Civil War American History: Of all the members of the Ibn Tibbon family, Samuel was the most influential. Al-Harizi was right about one thing: Maimonides, Commentary on the Mishnah, Avot The first major translation of Maimonides by Ibn Tibbon was the commentary on Avot, which was completed, according to the manuscript, in Samuel also prepared an index of tibbkn Biblical verses quoted in the Moreh.
Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. In ibbn preface to the translation of the GuideIbn Tibbon explains that, in his translation of Maimonides, he had consulted previous translations, rendered by his father and by others.
It is also evident that despite his dependence on Maimonides, Ibn Tibbon sometimes comes up with insights that are very much his own.
This article includes a list of referencesrelated reading or external linksbut its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations.
Samuel ibn Tibbon – Oxford Scholarship
Know that the demonstrative sciences have three divisions: Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter. Samuel ben Judah ibn Tibbon c. Open access to the SEP is made possible by a world-wide funding initiative. Defense of translation After completing the first version of the GuideJudah al-Harizi produced a rival translation, apparently at the request of some sages from southern France.
Enhanced bibliography for this entry at PhilPaperswith links to its database. In the preface to the commentary on Ecclesiastes, Ibn Tibbon also seems to provide explanation why the literal translation of philosophical texts is superior.
In the preface to the translation of Maimonides on Avot, as well as in the commentary on Ecclesiastes, Ibn Tibbon discusses these same verses from Jeremiah in detail, explains and criticizes Maimonides’ interpretation of them, then presents his own novel explication.